2013-10-23 | Astrid Menasanch Tobieson , Denise Olsson
INTERNATIONAL
In this Open Letter to all 145 countries parties to the UN Refugee Convention Astrid Menasanch Tobieson and Denise Olsson demand revisions to the convention. They point to the fact that women are not included linguistically in the convention and ask the question: "Did you really forget us?
To whom it may concern,
You forgot the women.
In 1951 The UN wrote the Refugee Convention. If you have received this letter you belong to the group of countries who ratified the Refugee Convention and/or the corresponding Protocol. The Refugee Convention and Protocol acknowledge the existence of refugees. Article 1 defines the term "refugee". Article 1 defines The Refugee as a he, him, his.
You forgot the women.
This leads us to the conclusion that if you are a woman you are not recognized as a refugee in accordance with the 1951's convention.
We notice that the language you have chosen to use in The Convention is normative.
We notice that the exclusion of women in the convention is not a mistake but rather a rule in the normative society.
We notice the fact that you did not find it necessary to change the definition when The Convention was revised in 1969.
Not once during the 62 years since the article was written has it been found necessary to revise Article 1, thus solidifying the current structure without reflecting upon it.
We notice that in December of 2010 The UN attached a new introduction to the Refugee Convention. It states that The Convention should be applied without discrimination in regards to, for example, gender. We therefore come to understand that you find it sufficient to dedicate half a sentence to women in refuge whilst men in refuge are protected by 46 articles in The Convention and Protocol.
This will not do. Furthermore, neither is this in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. According to Article 45 in The Convention “any Contracting State may request revisions of The Convention at any time”.
The time has come.
Since we believe that gender equality isn’t guaranteed, neither in practice nor theory in the corresponding 145 states, we demand that a revision is made of The Refugee Convention and Protocol. We demand that women who are forced into refuge shall be acknowledged as Refugees in Article 1 of the Convention. Hence we suggest the following amendment, change he, him, his to gender neutral words such as a person, the person, a person's.
You forgot the women.
Did we misunderstand or did you really forget us?
If you have any queries or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours sincerely,
Stå!Gerillan through
Astrid Menasanch Tobieson, astrid@stagerillan.se and Denise Olsson, denise@stagerillan.se
MEST KOMMENTERAT
SENASTE KOMMENTARERNA
Eva Schmitz - Jag vill bara hänvisa till min avhandling från 2007: Systers
Om Var Grupp 8 en feministisk organisation?
Abraham Adolfsson - Och härtill bör kanske sägas att jag är Finne och uppvuxen i
Om #bildskolan 21: Att äta Den Andre
Abraham Adolfsson - Ja, det är väl jättebra att ha ett intresse att ta till sig
Om #bildskolan 21: Att äta Den Andre
Per A.J. Andersson - Betalda övergrepp? Hmm… Brott ska lagföras, inte klumpas iho
Om Porr handlar om betalda övergrepp
Eva Annonssida - Finns ingen kärnvapen på marknadstorg.se
Om Nobels fredspris till kampanj för att avskaffa kärnvapen
gudrun tiberg - Hello nya Fempers nyheter! Underbart att allt blir tillgän
Om Feministiskt perspektiv öppnar arkivet och startar på nytt!
Eva NIkell - Jag är definitivt med dig, även om jag tyvärr inte sitter i
Om Rödgrönt ointresse för fred och nedrustning borde oroa många
Barbro Frost - Radikala och bra synpunkter.
Om Var inte målet att vi skulle jobba mindre?
Arina Stoenescu - Heja och tack för att ni finns! Glad första maj!
Om Feministiskt perspektiv öppnar arkivet och startar på nytt!
Frederick Lidman - Lite osäker på vad det här betyder i praktiken. Sidan femini
Om Feministiskt perspektiv öppnar arkivet och startar på nytt!
MEST LÄST